Skip Maine state header navigation
January 5, 2005
The Honorable Phillip
Bartlett II, Senate Chair
The Honorable
Lawrence Bliss, House Chair
115 State House Station
Augusta, Maine 04333
Dear Senator Bartlett and
Representative Bliss:
During
the first session of the 121st Legislature, you requested an
estimate of the Commission’s resources that were expended on each utility
sector that we regulated. Attached are
estimates of the percentages of the “time worked” and assessed revenues that
are “spent” on each utility sector.
We
have provided both estimates because the time worked in each sector does not
produce an accurate estimated of the relative cost burden of the various
sectors. In some sectors senior staff
(with higher pay levels) and a higher level of contractual services are
required to adequately address the issues that come to the Commission. Consequently, as shown in our analysis, we
spend about 4% more of the Commission’s total expenditures on electricity
matters (about 42%) than the percentage of hours worked (about 38%) might
suggest. Values for each utility sector will, of course, change from year to
year based on the needs in a particular utility sector
Our estimates were calculated based
on the following assumptions:
1. The percentage of “time worked” in each utility
sector is an estimate comprising the hours recorded by staff working in the
following areas: Electric, Natural Gas, Telecommunications, Water, Water Taxi,
Administrative, and Dig Safe. The hours
worked in the Administrative and Dig Safe areas were apportioned to each of the
utility sectors based on the fraction of time spent by other staff working in
specific utility sectors. The hours
worked by our Consumer Assistance Specialists were apportioned based on the
percentage of complaints by utility sector, i.e., Electric – 25%, Natural Gas –
4%, Telecommunication – 67%, and Water – 4%.
2. Similarly, the percentage of “dollars spent” in each
utility sector is an estimate comprising the dollars expended on staff working
in each of the areas listed above. The
dollars spent in Administrative and Dig Safe areas were then apportioned to
each of the utility sectors based on the fraction of dollars spent on other
staff and on contracts for specific utility sectors. The dollars spent for our Consumer Assistance Specialists were
apportioned based on the percentage of complaints by utility sector.
3. Vacation, Sick, Administrative leave, etc., were not
used in the calculation of these estimates.
As a matter of course the amount of each of these types of leave varies
from year to year for each staff member.
We assumed that they would be reflected in the fraction of time actually
attributed by staff to each of the areas for which they were required to
report.
4. The dollars spent in each sector are estimated based
on the time worked in each sector by staff and the averaged “fully burdened
hourly rate including benefits” for that staff member plus the amount of
contractual services provided for each utility sector.
5. Any money spent on Administrative or Dig Safe Contracts
was apportioned to each section based on the analysis of money expended on
staff working in each sector.
Pursuant to 35-A MSRA §116, for FY2005 the Commission assessed
Maine utilities $5,505,000. Of this
amount, we assessed transmission and distribution utilities at a rate that
produced $3,772,000, with the remaining $1,733,000 assessed against the
remaining utilities. Therefore,
approximately 68.5% of our revenues are derived from transmission and distribution
utilities with the remaining 31.5% coming from all other utilities based on
their gross intrastate operating revenues.
Please contact our Administrative
Director, Mr. Dennis L. Keschl at 287-1353, if you have any questions
surrounding this information or the method used in the calculation of our
estimates.
Sincerely,
Maine
Public Utilities Commission
Thomas
L. Welch, Chairman
Stephen
L. Diamond, Commissioner
Sharon
M. Reishus, Commissioner
Encl.
cc: Utilities and Energy Committee Members
Jon Clark, Legislative Analyst