Skip Maine state header navigation
Skip First Level Navigation | Skip All Navigation
| State Planning Office |
| SPO Home | Contact SPO |
Site Map |
|
Land Use Planning Program |
Land Use Planning
Basic Model for Site Plan ReviewThe text that follows sets out the components of a basic site plan review system in which the local Planning Board reviews all projects using a single set of standards and procedures. Please note that alternative ordinance provisions are included for many of the sections. Crafting a complete site plan review ordinance will require you to select the appropriate option for each part of the ordinance based upon the needs of your community. Periodically text will be bracketed and appear in [italics]. This indicates that you should make a choice among options or alerts you that the standard can be modified to more accurately reflect local situations and/or preferences. Once you have made a choice of options and other elements, you should add or modify the text and eliminate any inappropriate information, the brackets, and italics. Occasionally you will have to fill in a _____ with information that is specific to your community. Section 10 provides alternatives for structuring the site plan review system. This section includes alternative ordinance provisions for delegating site plan review to a Site Plan Review Board or to staff. It also includes alternative ordinance provisions for creating a bilevel review system. (Section 10 is also available for download in PDF format (5.6 MB).) Section 11 provides additional standards that some communities may want to include in their site plan review system. Most of these involve "good neighbor" and design issues. These are intended to be examples of the types of standards that are appropriate to include in site plan review. Standards of this type need to be carefully crafted to reflect the local character of the community and the type of development that is appropriate in a specific situation. (Section 11 is also available for download in PDF format (3.2 MB).)
PLEASE NOTE that this ordinance and its various sections should not be adopted without careful review to assure that its provisions are appropriate for the community. It is strongly recommended that you obtain and use a copy of the Handbook to help guide your decisions in working with the following text. Appendix A provides the text for a simple site plan review ordinance for a small community with limited nonresidential development and limited staff support. (Appendix A is also available for download in PDF format (2.6 MB).) To obtain a copy of the Handbook, please call 297-1486. Or, you can download the document from our site in PDF format. BASIC MODEL: SITE PLAN REVIEW ORDINANCEA. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY PROVISIONSPURPOSEThe site plan review provisions set forth in this [ordinance] [section] are intended to protect the public health and safety, promote the general welfare of the community, and conserve the environment by assuring that nonresidential [and multifamily] construction is designed and developed in a manner which assures that adequate provisions are made for traffic safety and access; emergency access; water supply; sewage disposal; management of stormwater, erosion, and sedimentation; protection of the groundwater; protection of the environment, wildlife habitat, fisheries, and unique natural areas; protection of historic and archaeological resources; minimizing the adverse impacts on adjacent properties; and fitting the project harmoniously into the fabric of the community. APPLICABILITY OF SITE PLAN REVIEWA person who has right, title, or interest in a parcel of land must obtain site plan approval prior to commencing any of the following activities on the parcel, obtaining a building or plumbing permit for the activities, or undertaking any alteration or improvement of the site including grubbing or grading:"
The following activities shall not require site plan approval. Certain of these activities will, however, require the owner to obtain a [building permit,] plumbing permit or other state or local approvals:
B. Review and Approval AuthorityREVIEW AND APPROVAL AUTHORITYThe Planning Board is authorized to review and act on all site plans for development requiring site plan review as defined above. In considering site plans under this provision, the Planning Board may act to approve, disapprove, or approve the project with conditions as are authorized by these provisions. C. ProceduresREVIEW PROCEDURESThe Planning Board shall use the following procedures in reviewing applications for site plan review. 1. PreapplicationPrior to submitting a formal application, the applicant or his/her representative may request a preapplication conference with the Planning Board. A preapplication conference is strongly advised. The preapplication conference shall be informal and informational in nature. There shall be no fee for a preapplication review, and such review shall not cause the plan to be a pending application or proceeding under Title 1 M.R.S.A. §302. No decision on the substance of the plan shall be made at the preapplication conference. 1.1 PurposeThe purposes of the preapplication conference are to:
In addition, the Board may schedule a site inspection in accordance with subsection 2(5) if deemed necessary and resolve any requests for waivers and variations from the submission requirements. 1.2 Information RequiredThere are no formal submission requirements for a preapplication conference. However, the applicant should be prepared to discuss the following with the Board:
2. Application Submission and Review ProceduresThe applicant shall prepare and submit a site plan review application, including the development plan and supporting documentation, that meets the submission requirements set forth below. This material shall be submitted to the [Chair of the Planning Board] [Code Enforcement Officer].
In issuing its decision, the Planning Board shall make written findings of fact establishing that the proposed development does or does not meet the standards of approval and other requirements of the Town. The Board shall notify the applicant, all officials who received notice under (1), and all parties who requested to be notified of the action of the Board, including the findings of fact, and any conditions of approval. This requirement can be met through the distribution of minutes of the meeting containing the findings of fact and decision of the Board. All time limits provided for in this section may be extended by mutual agreement of the applicant and Planning Board. 3. Final Approval and FilingUpon completion of the requirements of this Section and an approval vote by the majority of the Planning Board, the application shall be deemed to have final approval and the site plan shall be signed by a majority of the members of the Board and must be filed with the [Code Enforcement Officer]. Any plan not so filed within thirty (30) days of the date upon which such plan is approved and signed by the Board shall become null and void. [In addition, the signed plan shall be recorded in the _____ Registry of Deeds within thirty (30) days of the vote to approve the plan.] The Planning Board, by vote, may extend the filing period for good cause. 4. Fees4.1 Application FeeAn application for site plan review must be accompanied by an application fee. This fee is intended to cover the cost of the municipalitys administrative processing of the application, including notification, advertising, mailings, and similar costs. The fee shall not be refundable. This application fee shall be paid to the municipality, and evidence of payment of the fee shall be included with the application. 4.2 Technical Review FeeIn addition to the application fee, the applicant for site plan review must also pay a technical review fee to defray the municipalitys legal and technical costs of the application review. This fee must be paid to the municipality and shall be deposited in the Development Review Trust Account, which shall be separate and distinct from all other municipal accounts. The application will be considered incomplete until evidence of payment of this fee is submitted to the Planning Board. The Board may reduce the amount of the technical review fee or eliminate the fee if it determines that the scale or nature of the project will require little or no outside review. The technical review fee may be used by the Planning Board to pay reasonable costs incurred by the Board, at its discretion, which relate directly to the review of the application pursuant to the review criteria. Such services may include, but need not be limited to, consulting, engineering or other professional fees, attorney fees, recording fees, and appraisal fees. The municipality shall provide the applicant, upon written request, with an accounting of his or her account and shall refund all of the remaining monies, including accrued interest, in the account after the payment by the Town of all costs and services related to the review. Such payment of remaining monies shall be made no later than sixty (60) days after the approval of the application, denial of the application, or approval with condition of the application. Such refund shall be accompanied by a final accounting of expenditures from the fund. The monies in such fund shall not be used by the Board for any enforcement purposes nor shall the applicant be liable for costs incurred by or costs of services contracted for by the Board which exceed the amount deposited to the trust account. 4.3 Establishment of FeesThe Municipal Officers may, from time to time and after consultation with the Board, establish the appropriate application fees and technical review fees following posting of the proposed schedule of fees and public hearing. An application for site plan review must be accompanied by an application fee. This fee is intended to cover the cost of the municipalitys administrative processing of the application, including notification, advertising, mailings, and similar costs. The fee shall not be refundable. This application fee shall be paid to the municipality, and evidence of payment of the fee shall be included with the application. 4.2 Technical Review FeeIn addition to the application fee, the applicant for site plan review must also pay a technical review fee to defray the municipalitys legal and technical costs of the application review. This fee must be paid to the municipality and shall be deposited in the Development Review Trust Account, which shall be separate and distinct from all other municipal accounts. The application will be considered incomplete until evidence of payment of this fee is submitted to the Planning Board. The Board may reduce the amount of the technical review fee or eliminate the fee if it determines that the scale or nature of the project will require little or no outside review. The technical review fee may be used by the Planning Board to pay reasonable costs incurred by the Board, at its discretion, which relate directly to the review of the application pursuant to the review criteria. Such services may include, but need not be limited to, consulting, engineering or other professional fees, attorney fees, recording fees, and appraisal fees. The municipality shall provide the applicant, upon written request, with an accounting of his or her account and shall refund all of the remaining monies, including accrued interest, in the account after the payment by the Town of all costs and services related to the review. Such payment of remaining monies shall be made no later than sixty (60) days after the approval of the application, denial of the application, or approval with condition of the application. Such refund shall be accompanied by a final accounting of expenditures from the fund. The monies in such fund shall not be used by the Board for any enforcement purposes nor shall the applicant be liable for costs incurred by or costs of services contracted for by the Board which exceed the amount deposited to the trust account. 4.3 Establishment of FeesThe Municipal Officers may, from time to time and after consultation with the Board, establish the appropriate application fees and technical review fees following posting of the proposed schedule of fees and public hearing. D. Submission RequirementsSUBMISSION REQUIREMENTSApplications for site plan review must be submitted on application forms provided by the municipality. The complete application form, evidence of payment of the required fees, and the required plans and related information must be submitted to the [Chair of the Planning Board] [Code Enforcement Officer]. The submission must contain at least the following exhibits and information unless specifically waived in writing. The Planning Board may waive any of the submission requirements based upon a written request of the applicant. Such request must be made at the time of the preapplication conference or at the initial review of the application if no preapplication conference is held. A waiver of any submission requirement may be granted only if the Board makes a written finding that the information is not required to determine compliance with the standards. All applications for site plan review must contain the following information:
1. General Information
2. Existing Conditions
3. Proposed Development Activity
4. Approval BlockSpace must be provided on the plan drawing for the signatures of the Planning Board and date together with the following words, "Approved: [City] [Town] of [name of City or Town] Planning Board. E. Standards and CriteriaAPPROVAL STANDARDS AND CRITERIAThe following criteria shall be used by the Planning Board in reviewing applications for site plan review and shall serve as minimum requirements for approval of the application. The application shall be approved unless the Planning Board determines that the applicant has failed to meet one or more of these standards. In all instances, the burden of proof shall be on the applicant who must produce evidence sufficient to warrant a finding that all applicable criteria have been met. 1. Utilization of the SiteUtilization of the Site - The plan for the development must reflect the natural capabilities of the site to support development. Buildings, lots, and support facilities must be clustered in those portions of the site that have the most suitable conditions for development. Environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains, significant wildlife habitats, fisheries, scenic areas, habitat for rare and endangered plants and animals, unique natural communities and natural areas, and sand and gravel aquifers must be maintained and preserved to the maximum extent. Natural drainage areas must also be preserved to the maximum extent. The development must include appropriate measures for protecting these resources, including but not limited to, modification of the proposed design of the site, timing of construction, and limiting the extent of excavation. 2. Traffic Access and ParkingAdequacy of Road System - Vehicular access to the site must be on roads which have adequate capacity to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the development. or
Adequacy of Road System - Vehicular access to the site must be on roads which have adequate capacity to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the development. For developments which generate [one hundred (100)] or more peak hour trips based on the latest edition of the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Traffic Engineers, intersections on major access routes to the site within [one (1) mile] of any entrance road which are functioning at a Level of Service of D or better prior to the development must function at a minimum at Level of Service D after development. If any such intersection is functioning at a Level of Service E or lower prior to the development, the project must not reduce the current level of service. This requirement may be waived by the Planning Board if the project is located within a growth area designated in the [Towns] [Citys] adopted Comprehensive Plan and the Board determines that the project will not have an unnecessary adverse impact on traffic flow or safety. A development not meeting this requirement may be approved if the applicant demonstrates that:
Access into the Site - Vehicular access to and from the development must be safe and convenient. or Access into the Site - Vehicular access to and from the development must be safe and convenient.
Accessway Location and Spacing - Accessways must meet the following standards:
Internal Vehicular Circulation - The layout of the site must provide for the safe movement of passenger, service and emergency vehicles through the site. or
Internal Vehicular Circulation - The layout of the site must provide for the safe movement of passenger, service, and emergency vehicles through the site.
Parking Layout and Design - Off-street parking must conform to the following standards:
3. Pedestrian AccessPedestrian Circulation - The site plan must provide for a system of pedestrian ways within the development appropriate to the type and scale of development. This system must connect the major building entrances/exits with parking areas and with existing sidewalks, if they exist or are planned in the vicinity of the project. The pedestrian network may be located either in the street right-of-way or outside of the right-of-way in open space or recreation areas. The system must be designed to link the project with residential, recreational, and commercial facilities, schools, bus stops, and existing sidewalks in the neighborhood or, when appropriate, to connect with amenities such as parks or open space on or adjacent to the site. 4. Stormwater ManagementStormwater Management - Adequate provisions must be made for the collection and disposal of all stormwater that runs off from proposed streets, parking areas, roofs and other surfaces, through a stormwater drainage system and maintenance plan, which must not have adverse impacts on abutting or downstream properties. or Stormwater Management - Adequate provisions must be made for the collection and disposal of all stormwater that runs off proposed streets, parking areas, roofs, and other surfaces, through a stormwater drainage system and maintenance plan, which must not have adverse impacts on abutting or downstream properties.
5. Erosion ControlErosion Control - All building, site, and roadway designs and layouts must harmonize with existing topography and conserve desirable natural surroundings to the fullest extent possible, such that filling, excavation and earth moving activity must be kept to a minimum. Parking lots on sloped sites must be terraced to avoid undue cut and fill, and/or the need for retaining walls. Natural vegetation must be preserved and protected wherever possible. Soil erosion and sedimentation of watercourses and water bodies must be minimized by an active program meeting the requirements of the Maine Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook for Construction: Best Management Practices, dated March 1991. 6. Water Supply ProvisionsWater Supply - The development must be provided with a system of water supply that provides each use with an adequate supply of water. If the project is to be served by a public water supply, the applicant must secure and submit a written statement from the supplier that the proposed water supply system conforms with its design and construction standards, will not result in an undue burden on the source or distribution system, and will be installed in a manner adequate to provide needed domestic and fire protection flows. 7. Sewage Disposal ProvisionsSewage Disposal - The development must be provided with a method of disposing of sewage which is in compliance with the State Plumbing Code. If provisions are proposed for on-site waste disposal, all such systems must conform to the Subsurface Wastewater Disposal Rules. or Sewage Disposal - The development must be provided with a method of disposing of sewage which is in compliance with the State Plumbing Code.
8. UtilitiesUtilities - The development must be provided with electrical, telephone, and telecommunication service adequate to meet the anticipated use of the project. New utility lines and facilities must be screened from view to the extent feasible. If the service in the street or on adjoining lots is underground, the new service must be placed underground. 9. Natural FeaturesNatural Features - The landscape must be preserved in its natural state insofar as practical by minimizing tree removal, disturbance and compaction of soil, and by retaining existing vegetation insofar as practical during construction. Extensive grading and filling must be avoided as far as possible. 10. Groundwater ProtectionGroundwater Protection - The proposed site development and use must not adversely impact either the quality or quantity of groundwater available to abutting properties or to public water supply systems. Applicants whose projects involve on-site water supply or sewage disposal systems with a capacity of two thousand (2,000) gallons per day or greater must demonstrate that the groundwater at the property line will comply, following development, with the standards for safe drinking water as established by the State of Maine. 11. Water Quality ProtectionWater Quality Protection - All aspects of the project must be designed so that:
12. Hazardous, Special, and Radioactive MaterialsHazardous, Special and Radioactive Materials - The handling, storage, and use of all materials identified by the standards of a federal or state agency as hazardous, special or radioactive must be done in accordance with the standards of these agencies. No flammable or explosive liquids, solids or gases shall be stored in bulk above ground unless they are located at least seventy-five (75) feet from any lot line, or forty (40) feet in the case of underground storage. All materials must be stored in a manner and location which is in compliance with appropriate rules and regulations of the Maine Department of Public Safety and other appropriate federal, state, and local regulations. 13. Shoreland RelationshipShoreland Relationship - The development must not adversely affect the water quality or shoreline of any adjacent water body. The development plan must provide for access to abutting navigable water bodies for the use of the occupants of the development as appropriate. 14. Capacity of the ApplicantTechnical and Financial Capacity - The applicant must demonstrate that he/she has the financial and technical capacity to carry out the project in accordance with this ordinance and the approved plan. 15. Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Disposal - The proposed development must provide for adequate disposal of solid wastes. All solid waste must be disposed of at a licensed disposal facility having adequate capacity to accept the projects wastes. 16. Historic and Archaeological ResourcesHistoric and Archaeological Resources - If any portion of the site has been identified as containing historic or archaeological resources, the development must include appropriate measures for protecting these resources, including but not limited to, modification of the proposed design of the site, timing of construction, and limiting the extent of excavation. 17. Floodplain ManagementFloodplain Management - If any portion of the site is located within a special flood hazard area as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, all use and development of that portion of the site must be consistent with the [Towns] [Citys] Floodplain management provisions. F. Post Approval ActivitiesLIMITATION OF APPROVALSubstantial construction of the improvements covered by any site plan approval must be substantially commenced within [twelve (12) months] of the date upon which the approval was granted. If construction has not been substantially commenced and substantially completed within the specified period, the approval shall be null and void. The applicant may request an extension of the approval deadline prior to the expiration of the period. Such request must be in writing and must be made to the Planning Board. The Planning Board may grant up to [two (2), six (6)] month extensions to the periods if the approved plan conforms to the ordinances in effect at the time the extension is granted and any and all federal and state approvals and permits are current. INCORPORATION OF APPROVED PLANOne copy of the approved site plan must be included with the application for the building permit for the project and all construction activities must conform to the approved plan, including any conditions of approval and minor changes approved by the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] to address field conditions. RECORDING OF THE APPROVED PLANOne copy of the approved site plan must be recorded in the ______ County Registry of Deeds within thirty (30) days of approval and the book and page number provided to the Code Enforcement Officer. Failure to record the plan within thirty (30) days shall void the approval. The Planning Board may extend this period for cause. IMPROVEMENT GUARANTEES1. Application
2. Form of GuaranteePerformance guarantees may be provided by a variety of means including, but not limited to, the following which must be approved as to form and enforceability by the [Town Manager] [City Manager] [Board of Selectmen] [Municipal Attorney].
SUBMISSION OF AS-BUILT PLANSAny project involving the construction of more than [twenty thousand (20,000)] square feet of gross floor area or [fifty thousand (50,000)] square feet of impervious surface, must provide the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] with a set of construction plans showing the building(s) and site improvements as actually constructed on the site. These "as-built" plans must be submitted within thirty (30) days of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project or occupancy of the building. MINOR CHANGES TO APPROVED PLANSMinor changes in approved plans necessary to address field conditions may be approved by the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] provided that any such change does not affect compliance with the standards or alter the essential nature of the proposal. Any such change must be endorsed in writing on the approved plan by the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer]. AMENDMENTS TO APPROVED PLANSApprovals of site plans are dependent upon and limited to the proposals and plans contained in the application and supporting documents submitted and affirmed to by the applicant. Any variation from the plans, proposals, and supporting documents, except minor changes that do not affect approval standards, is subject to review and approval. G. AppealsAPPEAL OF PLANNING BOARD ACTIONSAppeal of any actions taken by the Planning Board with respect to this section shall be to the Superior Court in accordance with the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 80B. APPEAL OF PLANNING BOARD ACTIONSAppeal of any actions taken by the Planning Board with respect to this section shall be to the Board of Appeals. Any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date upon which the Planning Board voted to take action on the application. Any aggrieved party may appeal the action of the Planning Board. H. Administrative ProvisionsDEFINITIONS1. Meaning of WordsAll words not defined herein shall carry their customary and usual meanings. Words used in the present tense shall include the future. Words used in the singular shall include the plural. 2. DefinitionsABUTTING PROPERTY: Any lot which is physically contiguous with the subject lot even if only at a point and any lot which is located directly across a street or right-of-way from the subject lot such that the extension of the side lot lines of the subject lot would touch or enclose the abutting property.
ACCESSORY BUILDING: A detached, subordinate building, the use of which is clearly incidental and related to that of the principal building or use of the land, and which is located on the same lot as that of the principal building or use.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OR USE: A use or structure which is incidental and subordinate to the principal use or structure. Accessory uses, when aggregated shall not subordinate the principal use of the lot. A deck or similar extension of the principal structure or a garage attached to the principal structure by a roof or a common wall is considered part of the principal structure.
AGGRIEVED PARTY: An owner of land whose property is directly or indirectly affected by the granting or denial of an approval under this ordinance; a person whose land abuts land for which approval has been granted; or any other person or group of persons who have suffered particularized injury as a result of the granting or denial of such approval.
ARTERIAL: A controlled access road or a street or road with traffic signals at important intersections and/or stop signs on side streets or which is functionally classified by the Maine Department of Transportation as an arterial.
BUILDING: Any permanent structure, having one or more floors and a roof, which is used for the housing or enclosure of persons, animals or property. When any portion thereof is separated by a division wall without opening, then each such portion shall be deemed a separate building.
BUILDING FOOTPRINT: The area covered by a building measured from the exterior surface of the exterior walls at grade level exclusive of cantilevered portions of the building. Where the building is elevated above grade level on posts or similar devices, the building footprint is the area the building would cover if it were located at ground level.
CHANGE FROM ONE CATEGORY OF NONRESIDENTIAL USE TO ANOTHER CATEGORY OF NONRESIDENTIAL USE: A change in the type of occupancy of a nonresidential building or structure, or a portion thereof, such that the basic type of use is changed, such as from retail to office or storage to a restaurant, but not including a change in the occupants.
COLLECTOR STREET: A street that collects traffic from local streets and connects with arterials or a street or road functionally classified as a collector by the Maine Department of Transportation.
CURB CUT: The opening along the curb line or street right-of-way line at which point vehicles may enter or leave the street.
ENLARGEMENT OR EXPANSION OF A STRUCTURE: An increase of the building footprint and/or increase in the height of the structure beyond its present highest point. Alterations of existing buildings which are required in order to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and/or the State Fire Code are not considered to be enlargements or expansions of a structure and are not required to meet otherwise applicable setback requirements, provided the alterations are the minimum necessary to satisfy the ADA and/or State Fire Code.
ENLARGEMENT OR EXPANSION OF USE: Any intensification of use in time, volume, or function, whether or not resulting from an increase in the footprint, height, floor area, land area or cubic volume occupied by a particular use. Increases which are required in order to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and/or the State Fire Code are not considered to be enlargements or expansions of use.
FISHERIES, SIGNIFICANT FISHERIES: Areas identified by a governmental agency such as the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Atlantic Salmon Authority, or Maine Department of Marine Resources as having significant value as fisheries and any areas so identified in the municipalitys comprehensive plan.
FLOOR AREA: The sum of the horizontal areas of the floor(s) of a structure enclosed by exterior walls.
GROUNDWATER: All of the water found beneath the surface of the ground. For purposes of aquifer protection, this term refers to the subsurface water present in aquifers and recharge areas.
HISTORIC OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Areas identified by a governmental agency such as the Maine Historic Preservation Commission as having significant value as an historic or archaeological resource and any areas identified in the municipalitys comprehensive plan.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: The area covered by buildings and associated constructed facilities, areas which have been or will be covered by a low-permeability material, such as asphalt or concrete, and areas such as gravel roads and unpaved parking areas, which have been or will be compacted through design or use to reduce their permeability. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam, or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater.
LOCAL STREET: A public street or road which is not identified as an arterial or collector. A local street includes a proposed street shown on an approved and recorded subdivision.
LOT AREA: The area of land enclosed within the boundary lines of a lot, minus land below the normal high-water line of a water body or upland edge of a wetland and areas beneath roads serving more than two lots.
NATURAL AREAS AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES, UNIQUE NATURAL AREAS AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES: Areas identified by a governmental agency such as the Maine Department of Conservation Natural Areas Program as having significant value as a natural area and any areas identified in the municipalitys comprehensive plan.
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE: A building other than one which is used for purposes wholly incidental or accessory to the use of another building or use on the same premises.
PRINCIPAL USE: A use other than one which is wholly incidental or accessory to another use on the same premises.
RECHARGE AREA: Area composed of permeable, porous material through which precipitation and surface water infiltrate and directly replenish groundwater in aquifers.
SETBACK, FRONT: An open area extending the entire width of a lot from lot sideline to lot sideline and extending in depth at a right angle from the street right-of-way to such depth as specified. Such area shall be unoccupied and unobstructed by any building from the ground upward.
SETBACK, REAR: An open area extending the entire width of a lot from lot sideline to lot sideline and extending at a right angle from the rear property line of such lot to such depth as specified. Such area shall be unoccupied and unobstructed by any building from the ground upward.
SETBACK, SIDE: An open area extending along each sideline of a lot between the front setback and the rear setback on such lot and extending at a right angle from the sidelines of such lot to such depth as specified. Such area shall be unoccupied and unobstructed by any building from the ground upward.
STRUCTURE: Anything constructed or erected, which requires location on the ground or attached to something having a location on the ground, but not including a tent or vehicle.
SUBSTANTIALLY COMMENCED; SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED: Construction shall be considered to be substantially commenced when any work beyond the stage of excavation, including but not limited to, the pouring of a slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation has begun. Construction shall be considered to be substantially completed when it has been completed to the point where normal functioning, use, or occupancy can occur without concern for the general health, safety, and welfare of the occupant and the general public. At a minimum it shall include the completion of no less than [seventy (70)] percent of the costs of the proposed improvements within a development and shall include permanent stabilization and/or revegetation of areas of the site that were disturbed during construction.
USE: The purpose for which land or a building is arranged, designed, or intended, or for which either land or a building is or may be occupied or maintained.
VEGETATION: All live trees, shrubs, ground cover, and other plants.
WILDLIFE HABITAT; SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Areas identified by a governmental agency such as the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife as having significant value as habitat for animals and any areas identified in the municipalitys comprehensive plan. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENTThis ordinance shall be administered and enforced by a Code Enforcement Officer (CEO) appointed by the Municipal Officers. It shall be the duty of the CEO or his/her agent to enforce the provisions of this ordinance. If the CEO or his/her agent shall find that any provision of this ordinance is being violated, he/she shall notify in writing the person responsible for such violation, indicating the nature of the violation and ordering the action necessary to correct it. He/she shall order discontinuance of illegal use of buildings, structures, additions, or work being done, or shall take any other action authorized by this ordinance to insure compliance with or to prevent violation of its provisions. The CEO is hereby authorized to institute or cause to be instituted, in the name of the municipality, any and all actions, legal or equitable, that may be appropriate or necessary for the enforcement of this ordinance; provided, however, that this section shall not prevent any person entitled to equitable relief from enjoining any act contrary to the provisions of this ordinance. Any person, firm, or corporation being the owner of or having control or use of any building or premises who violated any of the provisions of this ordinance, shall be fined in accordance with Title 30-A M.R.S.A. § 4452. Each day such a violation is permitted to exist after notification shall constitute a separate offense. The Municipal Officers, or their authorized agent, are hereby authorized to enter into administrative consent agreements for the purpose of eliminating violations of this Ordinance and recovering fines without court action. Such agreements shall not allow an illegal structure or use to continue unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the illegal structure or use was constructed or conducted as a direct result of erroneous advice given by an authorized municipal official and there is no evidence that the owner acted in bad faith, or unless the removal of the structure or use will result in a threat or hazard to public health and safety or will result in substantial environmental damage. INTERPRETATION OF THE ORDINANCEThe Code Enforcement Officer (CEO) shall be responsible for administering the provisions of this ordinance including interpreting the provisions hereof. Any person who believes that the CEO has made an error in the interpretation or application of the provisions of this ordinance, may appeal such determination to the Board of Appeals as an administrative appeal. If the Board finds that the CEO erred in his/her interpretation of the ordinance, it shall modify or reverse the action accordingly. AMENDMENTS TO THE ORDINANCEAmendments of this ordinance may be initiated by the Municipal Officers, the Planning Board, or as specified in [the Town Charter][Title 20-A M.R.S.A.§2522]. No proposed amendments to this ordinance shall be referred to the [Town Meeting] [Town Council] until the Municipal Officers have held a public hearing on the proposal, notice of which shall be posted at least fourteen (14) days prior to such hearing and advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least two (2) times with the date of first publication being at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing and the second at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing. The proposed amendments shall be adopted by a simple majority vote of the [Town Meeting] [Town Council]. SEVERABILITYThe invalidity of any section or provision of this ordinance shall not be held to invalidate any other section or provision of this ordinance. SECTION 10. ALTERNATIVES FOR STRUCTURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW SYSTEMA. Review and Approval AlternativesOPTION 1 - SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD REVIEW OF ALL PROJECTSREVIEW AND APPROVAL AUTHORITY
The Site Plan Review Board is authorized to review and act on all site plans for development requiring site plan review as defined above. In considering site plans under this provision, the Site Plan Review Board may act to approve, disapprove, or approve the project with conditions as are authorized by these provisions. SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD1. Site Plan Review Board Established
There is hereby created a Site Plan Review Board for the [City] [Town] of ___________. 2. Appointment, Tenure, Qualification and Vacancy The Site Plan Review Board shall consist of seven (7) members who shall be appointed by the Municipal Officers, who shall serve without pay, and who shall be representatives of the [City] [Town] at large. Each member shall be appointed for three (3) years. The terms of the members shall be staggered. During the initial organization of the Board, two (2) members shall be appointed to three (3) year terms, two (2) members to two (2) year terms, and three (3) members to one (1) year terms. Members appointed must be residents of the [City] [Town]. A Municipal Officer or his/her spouse may not be a member of the Site Plan Review Board. A vacancy may occur by reason of resignation, death, giving up residency or failure to attend at least seventy-five percent (75%) of all meetings during the previous twelve (12) months. The Chair of the Board shall immediately notify the Municipal Officers in writing of any vacancy when it occurs. Members may be removed for cause by the Municipal Officers after presentation of written charges and public hearing. 3. Organization and Rules
At the first regular meeting of the Board in [January] of each year, the members shall meet and elect a chair and vice chair and such other officers as they may determine to serve for a period of one (1) year or until a successor is elected. A member may succeed himself or herself in office if so elected. The Board shall hold a regular monthly meeting and other meetings as it deems necessary from time to time. Any records deemed "public records" under State law may be inspected during regular business hours. A quorum shall consist of four (4) members. Any question of whether a particular issue involves a conflict of interest sufficient to disqualify a member from voting thereon shall be decided by a majority vote of the remaining members present and voting, except the member who is being challenged. 4. Powers and Duties
The Site Plan Review Board shall be empowered to review and act on site plans as provided in this section. The Board shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be necessary for the administration of its affairs on behalf of the [City] [Town], including, without limitation, the adoption of bylaws and regulations and the procurement of goods and services necessary for its proper functions within the limits of its budget as approved by the Municipal Officers. OPTION 2 - PLANNING BOARD REVIEW OF ALL PROJECTS WITH DIFFERING LEVELS OF REQUIREMENTSREVIEW AND APPROVAL AUTHORITY
The Planning Board is authorized to review and act on site plans for both minor developments and major developments as defined below. In considering site plans under this section, the Planning Board may act to approve, disapprove, or approve the project with conditions as are authorized by these provisions. CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECTSThe Planning Board shall classify each project as a major or minor development. Minor developments are smaller scale, less complex projects for which a less complex review process is adequate to protect the [Citys] [Towns] interest. Major developments are larger, more complex projects for which a more detailed review process and additional information are necessary.
Minor developments shall include those projects involving the construction or addition of fewer than [five thousand (5,000)] square feet of gross nonresidential floor area or projects involving only the installation of impervious surfaces, or projects involving the creation of fewer than [five (5)] dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or projects involving the conversion of existing buildings or structures from one use to another without enlargement of the gross floor area.
Major developments shall include projects involving the construction or addition of [five thousand (5,000)] or more square feet of gross nonresidential floor area, or projects involving the creation of [five (5)] or more dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or other projects requiring review which are not classified as minor developments." OPTION 3 - SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD REVIEW OF ALL PROJECTS WITH DIFFERING LEVELS OF REQUIREMENTSREVIEW AND APPROVAL AUTHORITY
The Site Plan Review Board is authorized to review and act on site plans for minor developments and for major developments as defined below. In considering site plans under this section, the Site Plan Review Board may act to approve, disapprove, or approve the project with conditions as are authorized by these provisions. SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD1. Site Plan Review Board Established
There is hereby created a Site Plan Review Board for the [City] [Town] of ___________. 2. Appointment, Tenure, Qualification and Vacancy The Site Plan Review Board shall consist of seven (7) members who shall be appointed by the Municipal Officers, who shall serve without pay, and who shall be representatives of the [City] [Town] at large. Each member shall be appointed for three (3) years. The terms of the members shall be staggered. During the initial organization of the Board, two (2) members shall be appointed to three (3) year terms, two (2) members to two (2) year terms, and three (3) members to one (1) year terms. Members appointed must be residents of the [City] [Town]. A Municipal Officer or his/her spouse may not be a member of the Site Plan Review Board. A vacancy may occur by reason of resignation, death, giving up residency or failure to attend at least seventy-five percent (75%) of all meetings during the previous twelve (12) months. The Chair of the Board shall immediately notify the Municipal Officers in writing of any vacancy when it occurs. Members may be removed for cause by the Municipal Officers after presentation of written charges and public hearing. 3. Organization and Rules
At the first regular meeting of the Board in [January] of each year, the members shall meet and elect a chair and vice chair and such other officers as they may determine to serve for a period of one (1) year or until a successor is elected. A member may succeed himself or herself in office if so elected. The Board shall hold a regular monthly meeting and other meetings as it deems necessary from time to time. Any records deemed "public records" under State law may be inspected during regular business hours. A quorum shall consist of four (4) members. Any question of whether a particular issue involves a conflict of interest sufficient to disqualify a member from voting thereon shall be decided by a majority vote of the remaining members present and voting, except the member who is being challenged. 4. Powers and Duties
The Site Plan Review Board shall be empowered to review and act on site plans as provided in this section. The Board shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be necessary for the administration of its affairs on behalf of the [City] [Town], including, without limitation, the adoption of bylaws and regulations and the procurement of goods and services necessary for its proper functions within the limits of its budget as approved by the Municipal Officers. CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECTSThe Site Plan Review Board shall classify each project as a major or minor development. Minor developments are smaller scale, less complex projects for which a less complex review process is adequate to protect the [Citys] [Towns] interest. Major developments are larger, more complex projects for which a more detailed review process and additional information are necessary.
Minor developments shall include those projects involving the construction or addition of fewer than [five thousand (5,000)] square feet of gross nonresidential floor area or projects involving only the installation of impervious surfaces, or projects involving the creation of fewer than [five (5)] dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or projects involving the conversion of existing buildings or structures from one use to another without enlargement of the gross floor area.
Major developments shall include projects involving the construction or addition of [five thousand (5,000)] or more square feet of gross nonresidential floor area, or projects involving the creation of [five (5)] or more dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or other projects requiring review which are not classified as minor developments." OPTION 4 - BILEVEL REVIEW SYSTEM WITH PLANNING BOARD REVIEW OF LARGER PROJECTS AND A STAFF COMMITTEE TO REVIEW SMALLER PROJECTSREVIEW AND APPROVAL AUTHORITYThe review and approval authority for site plans shall depend on the classification of the project: 1. Major Developments
The Planning Board is authorized to review and act on all site plans for major developments. In considering site plans under this section, the Planning Board may act to approve, disapprove, or approve the project with such conditions as are authorized by this Section. 2. Minor Developments
The Staff Review Committee is authorized to review all site plans for minor developments and may approve, disapprove, or approve the project with such conditions as are authorized by this Section. In addition, the Committee may reclassify a minor development as a major development and forward it to the Planning Board with its recommendations for Planning Board action. STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE1. Staff Review Committee Established There is hereby created a Staff Review Committee. The Staff Review Committee shall consist of the [Planner, Engineer, Code Enforcement Officer, Police Chief, and Fire Chief] or their designees. 2. Operation of the Staff Review Committee
The Planner shall serve as Chair of the Staff Review Committee and shall be responsible for calling meetings of the Committee, presiding at its meetings, and maintaining the records of the Committee. In the absence of the Planner or his/her designee, the [Engineer] shall serve as chair pro tem. If any member of the Staff Review Committee is unable to attend any meeting of the Committee, he/she may designate another member of that department to serve in his/her place. Such designation must be in writing and shall apply only to that meeting. This designee shall have the same power and authority as the member. The Staff Review Committee shall meet [biweekly]. Meetings of the Committee must be advertised in the same manner as those of other [City] [Town] committees and must be open to the public. If a vacancy exists in any of the positions serving on the Committee, the [Manager] [Administrator] [Council] [Chair of the Board of Selectmen] shall name an interim committee member with appropriate expertise in the respective department, until such vacancy is filled. CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECTSThe Planner shall classify each project as a major or minor development. Minor developments are smaller scale, less complex projects for which a less complex review process is adequate to protect the [Citys] [Towns] interest. Major developments are larger, more complex projects for which a more detailed review process and additional information are necessary.
Minor developments shall include those projects involving the construction or addition of fewer than [five thousand (5,000)] square feet of gross nonresidential floor area or projects involving only the installation of impervious surfaces, or projects involving the creation of fewer than [five (5)] dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or projects involving the conversion of existing buildings or structures from one use to another without enlargement of the gross floor area.
Major developments shall include projects involving the construction or addition of [five thousand (5,000)] or more square feet of gross nonresidential floor area, or projects involving the creation of [five (5)] or more dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or other projects requiring review which are not classified as a minor development. An applicant may request that the Planner classify an application prior to its submission. In this case, the applicant must make a written request for a classification. This request must include the following information:
Within [ten (10)] working days of the receipt of a site plan application or a request for a classification, the Planner shall notify the applicant, and the Chair of the Planning Board of the classification of the project in writing. If the applicant believes that the Planner erred in the classification of the project, he/she may appeal the classification to the Planning Board. The appeal must occur within ten (10) working days of the date of the Planners determination and must be in writing. The appeal must set out the reasons that the petitioner believes that the application is misclassified. Within thirty (30) days of receiving an appeal, the Planning Board shall consider the appeal and determine if the classification is correct. If the Planning Board finds that the Planner erred in classifying the project, the Board shall direct the Planner to reclassify the project. When the Planner or Planning Board has classified a project based upon a request for classification rather than an application, the subsequent application must be consistent with the activities described in the request for classification. The Planner shall review such application to determine if the classification is still correct and may reclassify the application if the scope of activities has been changed. This action shall be appealable to the Planning Board as provided above." OPTION 5 - BILEVEL REVIEW SYSTEM WITH A SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD HANDLING LARGER PROJECTS AND A STAFF COMMITTEE TO REVIEW SMALLER PROJECTSREVIEW AND APPROVAL AUTHORITY
The review and approval authority for site plans shall depend on the classification of the project: 1. Major Developments
The Site Plan Review Board is authorized to review and act on all site plans for major developments. In considering site plans under this section, the Site Plan Review Board may act to approve, disapprove, or approve the project with such conditions as are authorized by this Section. 2. Minor Developments
The Staff Review Committee is authorized to review all site plans for minor developments and may approve, disapprove, or approve the project with such conditions as are authorized by this Section. In addition, the Committee may reclassify a minor development as a major development and forward it to the Site Plan Review Board with its recommendations for Site Plan Review Board action. SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD1. Site Plan Review Board Established
There is hereby created a Site Plan Review Board for the [City] [Town] of ___________. 2. Appointment, Tenure, Qualification and Vacancy The Site Plan Review Board shall consist of seven (7) members who shall be appointed by the Municipal Officers, who shall serve without pay, and who shall be representatives of the [City] [Town] at large. Each member shall be appointed for three (3) years, or until a successor is appointed. The terms of the members shall be staggered. During the initial organization of the Board, two (2) members shall be appointed to three (3) year terms, two (2) members to two (2) year terms, and three (3) members to one (1) year terms. Members appointed must be residents of the [City] [Town]. A Municipal Officer or his/her spouse may not be a member of the Site Plan Review Board. A vacancy may occur by reason of resignation, death, giving up residency or failure to attend at least seventy-five percent (75%) of all meetings during the previous twelve (12) months. The Chair of the Board shall immediately notify the Municipal Officers in writing of any vacancy when it occurs. Members may be removed for cause by the Municipal Officers after presentation of written charges and public hearing. 3. Organization and Rules
At the first regular meeting of the Board in [January] of each year, the members shall meet and elect a chair and vice chair and such other officers as they may determine to serve for a period of one (1) year or until a successor is elected. A member may succeed himself or herself in office if so elected. The Board shall hold a regular monthly meeting and other meetings as it deems necessary from time to time. Any records deemed "public records" under State law may be inspected during regular business hours. A quorum shall consist of four (4) members. Any question of whether a particular issue involves a conflict of interest sufficient to disqualify a member from voting thereon shall be decided by a majority vote of the remaining members present and voting, except the member who is being challenged. 4. Powers and Duties
The Site Plan Review Board shall be empowered to review and act on site plans as provided in this section. The Board shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be necessary for the administration of its affairs on behalf of the [City] [Town], including, without limitation, the adoption of bylaws and regulations and the procurement of goods and services necessary for its proper functions within the limits of its budget as approved by the Municipal Officers. STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE1. Staff Review Committee Established There is hereby created a Staff Review Committee. The Staff Review Committee shall consist of the [Planner, Engineer, Code Enforcement Officer, Police Chief, and Fire Chief] or their designees. 2. Operation of the Staff Review Committee
The Planner shall serve as Chair of the Staff Review Committee and shall be responsible for calling meetings of the Committee, presiding at its meetings, and maintaining the records of the Committee. In the absence of the Planner or his/her designee, the [Engineer] shall serve as chair pro tem. If any member of the Staff Review Committee is unable to attend any meeting of the Committee, he/she may designate another member of that department to serve in his/her place. Such designation must be in writing and shall apply only to that meeting. This designee shall have the same power and authority as the member. The Staff Review Committee shall meet [biweekly]. Meetings of the Committee must be advertised in the same manner as those of other [City] [Town] committees and must be open to the public. If a vacancy exists in any of the positions serving on the Committee, the [Manager] [Administrator] [Council] [Chair of the Board of Selectmen] shall name an interim committee member with appropriate expertise in the respective department, until such vacancy is filled. CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECTSThe Planner shall classify each project as a major or minor development. Minor developments are smaller scale, less complex projects for which a less complex review process is adequate to protect the [Citys] [Towns] interest. Major developments are larger, more complex projects for which a more detailed review process and additional information are necessary.
Minor developments shall include those projects involving the construction or addition of fewer than [five thousand (5,000)] square feet of gross nonresidential floor area or projects involving only the installation of impervious surfaces, or projects involving the creation of fewer than [five (5)] dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or projects involving the conversion of existing buildings or structures from one use to another without enlargement of the gross floor area.
Major developments shall include projects involving the construction or addition of [five thousand (5,000)] or more square feet of gross nonresidential floor area, or projects involving the creation of [five (5)] or more dwelling units in a five (5) year period, or other projects requiring review which are not classified as a minor development. An applicant may request that the Planner classify an application prior to its submission. In this case, the applicant must make a written request for a classification. This request must include the following information:
Within [ten (10)] working days of the receipt of a site plan application or a request for a classification, the Planner shall notify the applicant, and the Chair of the Site Plan Review Board of the classification of the project in writing. If the applicant believes that the Planner erred in the classification of the project, he/she may appeal the classification to the Site Plan Review Board. The appeal must occur within ten (10) working days of the date of the Planners determination and must be in writing. The appeal must set out the reasons that the petitioner believes that the application is misclassified. Within thirty (30) days of receiving an appeal, the Site Plan Review Board shall consider the appeal and determine if the classification is correct. If the Site Plan Review Board finds that the Planner erred in classifying the project, the Board shall direct the Planner to reclassify the project. When the Planner or Site Plan Review Board has classified a project based upon a request for classification rather than an application, the subsequent application shall be consistent with the activities described in the request for classification. The Planner shall review such application to determine if the classification is still correct and may reclassify the application if the scope of activities has been changed. This action shall be appealable to the Site Plan Review Board as provided above." B. ALTERNATIVE REVIEW PROCEDURESOPTION 1 - A BILEVEL REVIEW PROCESS WITH THE PLANNING BOARD OR SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD HANDLING BOTH MAJOR AND MINOR DEVELOPMENTSREVIEW PROCEDURES
The [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board shall use the following procedures in reviewing applications for site plan review. 1. Preapplication
Prior to submitting a formal application, the applicant or his/her representative must request a preapplication conference with the [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board] [Planner]. The preapplication conference shall be informal and informational in nature. There shall be no fee for a preapplication review, and such review shall not cause the plan to be a pending application or proceeding under Title 1 M.R.S.A. §302. No decisions on the substance of the plan shall be made at the preapplication conference. 1.1 Purpose
The purposes of the preapplication conference are to:
In addition, for minor projects, the [Board] [Planner] may schedule a site inspection in accordance with subsection 2.5 if deemed necessary, and resolve any requests for waivers and variations from the submission requirements. 1.2 Information Required There are no formal submission requirements for a preapplication conference. However, the applicant should be prepared to discuss the following with the [Board] [Planner]:
The applicants oral presentation and written materials about the scope and nature of the project must provide adequate information to allow the [Board] [Planner] to classify the project as a minor or major development. 1.3 Classification of Project The [Board] [Planner] shall classify the project as a major or minor development during the preapplication conference. 2. Application Submission and Review Procedures 2.1 Minor Developments 2.1 Minor Developments
Projects classified as minor developments shall go through a simplified review process. Applicants shall not be required to submit a site inventory and analysis and may proceed directly to preparing and submitting a formal site plan review application including the development plan and supporting documentation meeting the submission requirements. This material must be submitted to the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board]. 2.2 Major Developments Applicants with projects classified as major developments must submit a site inventory and analysis for [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board review. This review must be completed prior to the preparation and submission of a site plan review application and supporting documentation. The Board shall review the site inventory and analysis with the applicant and shall authorize the submission of the formal application when the site analysis is complete. The site inventory and analysis must be submitted to the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board]. 2.3 Procedures Following Submission of the Site Inventory and Analysis Upon receipt of a site inventory and analysis, the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board] shall give a dated receipt to the applicant. Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of a site inventory and analysis submission for a major development, the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board] shall review the material and determine whether or not the submission is complete. If the submission is determined to be incomplete, the applicant shall be notified in writing of this finding, which shall specify the additional material required to make the submission complete, and shall advise the applicant that the application will not be considered until the additional information is submitted. These steps, except the notification requirements, shall be repeated until the application is found to be complete. When the submission is determined to be complete, the applicant shall be notified in writing of this finding and the item placed on the agenda for informal review by the Board. The Planning Board shall hold an on-site inspection of the site to review the existing conditions, field verify the information submitted and investigate the development proposal. The Board may schedule this visit either before or after the first meeting at which the application is considered. The Board may decide not to hold an on-site inspection when the site is snow covered. If an application is pending during a period when there is snow cover, the deadline by which the Planning Board shall take final action on the application as specified in 2.7 may be extended, which extension shall not exceed [thirty (30)] days after the Board is able to conduct an on-site inspection. Written notice of the on-site inspection shall be provided to all parties entitled to notice under subsection 2.5. Within forty-five (45) days of the finding that the site inventory and analysis submission is complete, the Board shall complete its review of the submission and notify the applicant in writing of its findings. 2.4 Review of Site Inventory and Analysis The review of the site inventory and analysis shall be informational and shall not result in any formal approval or disapproval of the project by the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board. The parties identified in subsection 2.5 shall be notified of the time, date, and place of the Board meeting at which the site inventory and analysis will be reviewed. The Board shall review the submission to determine if the information provides a clear understanding of the site and identifies opportunities and constraints that help determine how it should be used and developed. The outcome of the review process shall be a determination by the Board of the issues and constraints that must be addressed in the formal site plan review application. The Board shall also act on any requests for waivers. 2.5 Procedures Following a Submission of a Site Plan Review Application (1) Upon receipt of a formal site plan review application, the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board] shall give a dated receipt to the applicant and shall notify by first-class mail all property owners within [five hundred (500)] feet of the parcel on which the proposed development is located. The notice shall specify the location of the proposed development and provide a general description of the project. Written notice of the pending application shall be mailed to the [Selectmen, Council, Town/City Manager, Fire Chief, Police Chief, Public Works Director, Building Inspector, Plumbing Inspector, and Superintendent of Schools], and a newspaper or newspapers in general circulation in [Town] [City]. (2) Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of a formal development review application, the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board] shall review the material and determine whether or not the submission is complete. If the application is determined to be incomplete, the applicant shall be notified in writing of this finding, which shall specify the additional materials required to make the application complete, and shall advise the applicant that the application will not be considered until the additional information is submitted. These steps, except the notification requirements, shall be repeated until the application is found to be complete. (3) As soon as the application is determined to be complete, the applicant shall be notified in writing of this finding. The notification requirements of subsection (4) below shall be met and the item placed on the agenda for substantive review within thirty (30) days of this finding. (4) The [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board shall give written notice of the date, time, and place of the meeting, or for major developments, the public hearing at which the application will be considered, to the applicant, all officials who received notice in (1), and all abutters. For major developments, a notice of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once, the date of publication shall be at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing. (5) The Board may hold an on-site inspection of the site to review the existing conditions, field verify the information submitted and investigate the development proposal. The Board may schedule this visit either before or after the public hearing. The Board will not hold an on-site inspection when the site is snow covered. If an application is pending during a period when there is snow cover, the Board will request that the applicant agree to extending the review period to allow an on-site inspection. The inability of the Board to hold a site inspection due to snow cover shall be sufficient grounds for denial of an application. Written notice shall be provided to all parties entitled to notice under (1) above.
2.6 Public Hearing on Major Development Applications (1) The Chair of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board or his/her replacement shall chair the public hearing. The Chair shall open the public hearing by identifying the application and explaining the purpose of the hearing and the procedures to be followed. (2) The purpose of the public hearing is to allow the applicant and affected property owners to provide information as part of the record that the Board will use in considering its action on the application. Testimony presented at the hearing should be related to factual information about the application and related submissions and the projects compliance with the review standards and other regulations and requirements of this ordinance or other municipal ordinances. (3) The Chair shall provide the applicant or his/her representative with an opportunity to make any statement or presentations at the beginning of the hearing. The Chair shall then allow the members of the Board to ask questions of the applicant and for the applicant to answer those questions. Following Board questions, the Chair shall open the public hearing to the public for statements, information submissions, or questions about the project. At the close of the public comment period, the Chair shall afford the applicant an opportunity to answer any questions raised by the public, rebut any statements or information submitted, and cross-examine anyone offering testimony on the application. The Chair may allow the applicant this opportunity after each member of the public testifies if that is deemed to be desirable. At the conclusion of the applicants response, the hearing shall be closed.
2.7 Final Action on the Application The [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board shall take final action on said application within [thirty (30)] days of the public hearing or within [forty-five (45)] days of the application being determined to be complete, if no public hearing is held. The Board shall act to deny, to approve, or to approve the application with conditions. The Board may impose such conditions as are deemed advisable to assure compliance with the standards of approval and performance standards of this ordinance. In issuing its decision, the Board shall make written findings of fact that establish whether the proposed development does or does not meet the standards of approval, performance standards, and other requirements of this Ordinance. The Board shall notify the applicant, all officials who previously received notice, and abutters who requested to be notified, of the action of the Board, including the findings of fact and any conditions of approval. This requirement can be met through the distribution of minutes of the meeting containing the findings of fact and decision of the Board. All time limits provided for in this section may be extended by mutual agreement of the applicant and Board. 3. Final Approval and Filing
Upon completion of the requirements of this article and an approval vote by the majority of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board members, the application shall be deemed to have final approval and the site plan shall be signed by a majority of the members of the Board and must be filed by the applicant with the [Code Enforcement Officer.] Any plan not so filed within thirty (30) days of the date upon which such plan is approved and signed by the Planning Board as herein provided shall become null and void. [In addition, the signed plan must be recorded in the ______ Registry of Deeds within thirty (30) days of the vote to approve the plan.] The Planning Board, by vote, may extend the filing period for good cause. 4. Fees 4.1 Site Inventory and Analysis Fees 4.1 Site Inventory and Analysis Fees
Prior to submitting a site inventory and analysis for a major development, the applicant must pay a processing fee. This fee must be paid to the municipality and evidence of payment of the fee must be included with the submission. 4.2 Application Fee An application for site plan review must be accompanied by an application fee. This fee is intended to cover the cost of the municipalitys administrative processing of the application, including notification, advertising, mailings, and similar costs. The fee shall not be refundable. This application fee must be paid to the municipality, and evidence of payment of the fee must be included with the application. 4.3 Technical Review Fee In addition to the application fee, the applicant for site plan review must also pay a technical review fee to defray the municipalitys legal and technical costs of the application review. This fee must be paid to the municipality and shall be deposited in the Development Review Trust Account, which shall be separate and distinct from all other municipal accounts. The application will be considered incomplete until evidence of payment of this fee is submitted to the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board. The Board may reduce the amount of the technical review fee or waive it if it determines that the scale or nature of the project will require little or no outside review. The technical review fee may be used by the Board to pay for reasonable costs incurred by the Board, at its discretion, which relate directly to the review of the application pursuant to the review criteria. Such services may include, but need not be limited to, consulting, engineering or other professional fees, attorney fees, recording fees, and appraisal fees. The municipality shall provide the applicant, upon written request, with an accounting of his or her account and shall refund all of the remaining monies, including accrued interest, in the account after the payment by the municipality of all costs and services related to the review. Such payment of remaining monies shall be made no later than sixty (60) days after the approval of the application, denial of the application, or approval with condition of the application. Such refund shall be accompanied by a final accounting of expenditures from the fund. The monies in such fund shall not be used by the Board for any enforcement purposes nor shall the applicant be liable for costs incurred by or costs of services contracted for by the Board which exceed the amount deposited to the trust account. 4.4 Establishment of Fees The Municipal Officers may, from time to time and after consultation with the Board, establish the appropriate fees following posting of the proposed schedule of fees and public hearing. OPTION 2 - A BILEVEL REVIEW PROCESS WITH THE PLANNING BOARD OR SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD HANDLING MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS AND A STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE HANDLING MINOR DEVELOPMENTSREVIEW PROCEDURES
The following procedures shall be used in reviewing applications for site plan review. 1. Procedures for Minor Developments 1.1 Preapplication Conference 1.1 Preapplication Conference Applicants for site plan review of a minor development are encouraged to schedule a preapplication conference with the Planner. The purpose of this meeting is to familiarize the applicant with the review procedures and submission requirements, and approval criteria, and to familiarize the Planner with the nature of the project. Such review shall not cause the plan to be a pending application or proceeding under Title 1 M.R.S.A. §302. No decisions relative to the plan may be made at this meeting. In connection with the preapplication review, the Planner may determine that an on-site inspection be held to familiarize the Staff Review Committee with the project site. The on-site inspection shall be scheduled by the Planner and shall be attended by the applicant and/or the applicants representative and members of the Staff Review Committee. All abutters to the property shall be notified, in writing, of the time and date of the site inspection. 1.2 Application Procedure The property owner or his/her representative must submit a formal minor development application for review and approval to the Planner. Upon receipt of the application, the Planning Office shall provide the applicant with a dated receipt showing the nature of the application and the fees paid. Within five (5) working days of receipt of an application for a minor development, the Planner shall review the application and determine if the application meets the submission requirements. The Planner shall review any requests for a waiver from the submission requirements and shall act on these requests prior to determining the completeness of the application. If the application is complete, the Planner shall notify the applicant and the Chair of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board in writing of this determination and the action on any waivers and shall provide copies of the application to the [Planning Office, Code Enforcement Office, Engineering Department, Police Department, and Fire Department]. If the application is incomplete, the Planner shall notify the applicant in writing of this determination, specify what additional materials or information are required to complete the application, and advise the applicant that the revised application package will be re-reviewed for completeness when it is resubmitted. In addition, if the application is deemed to be complete, the Planner shall notify all abutters to the site as shown on the assessors records, by first-class mail that an application has been filed. This notice shall contain a brief description of the proposed activity and the name of the applicant. It shall advise the party that a copy of the application is available for inspection and that written comments on the application will be received and considered by the Staff Review Committee, and provide the date, time, and place of the Committee meeting at which the application will be considered. Failure of any abutter to receive such notice shall not be grounds for delay of any consideration of the application nor denial of the project. 1.3 Staff Review Committee Meeting Within [fifteen (15)] working days of the application being determined to be complete, the Staff Review Committee shall consider the application at a regular meeting of the Committee. The Planner shall notify the applicant, Chair of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board and media in writing of the date, time and place of the meeting. The applicant and/or his/her representatives shall be allowed to make a presentation on the application, address any comments made by the staff or public, and present any proposed revisions to address these issues. Any abutters may comment on the application or ask questions of the applicant and/or his/her representatives. The focus of the Committees review shall be on the approval standards. The Staff Review Committee shall consider if the application complies with the standards and criteria. If the Committee finds that the application conforms to these requirements, it shall make written findings of fact and it shall vote to approve the application. Approval by the Committee shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Committee. The applicant, Chair of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board, and any abutters who commented on the application or attended the Committee meeting shall be notified in writing of the Committees action. The minutes of the Committee shall be adequate notification. 1.4 Appeal to the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board Any party aggrieved by the decisions of the Staff Review Committee may seek an appellate review by the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board. The appellant shall have ten (10) days in which to file such an appeal with the Chair of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board. The appeal must be in writing and must specify why the appellant believes the action of the Staff Review Committee was in error. If an appeal is filed, the application shall be placed on the agenda of the next regular meeting of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board. The appellant, applicant, and any abutters who provide written comments or attended a Committee meeting shall be notified in writing of the Board meeting. The Planner shall provide members of the Board with copies of the application, supporting material, any staff review comments, abutters comments, and minutes of the Staff Review Committee meeting at which the application was considered. The Board shall review the existing record of materials on an appellate basis and shall determine if the application conforms to the approval criteria and standards. If the Board finds that the application conforms to the standards, it shall approve the application, otherwise it shall deny the same. The Planner shall notify the appellant, applicant, and abutters who participated in the review of the action of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board. 2. Procedures for Major Developments 2.1 Preapplication Conference Applicants for site plan review of a major development are required to schedule a preapplication conference with the Planner. The purpose of this meeting is to familiarize the applicant with the review procedures and submission requirements, and approval criteria, and to familiarize the Planner with the nature of the project. Such review shall not cause the plan to be a pending application or proceeding under Title 1 M.R.S.A. §302. No decisions relative to the plan may be made at this meeting. 2.2 Information Required There are no formal submission requirements for a preapplication conference. However, the applicant should be prepared to discuss the following with the Planner:
The applicants oral presentation and written materials about the scope and nature of the project must provide adequate information to allow the Planner to classify the project as a minor or major development. 2.3 Site Inventory and Analysis Applicants for projects classified as major developments must submit a site inventory and analysis for [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board review. This review must be completed prior to the preparation and submission of a site plan review application and supporting documentation. The Board shall review the site inventory and analysis with the applicant and shall authorize the submission of the formal application when the site analysis is complete. The site inventory and analysis must be submitted to the [Planner] [Chair of the Board]. 2.4 Procedures Following Submission of the Site Inventory and Analysis Upon receipt of a site inventory and analysis, the Planner shall give a dated receipt to the applicant. Within ten (10) days of the receipt of a site inventory and analysis submission for a major development, the Planner shall review the material and determine whether or not the submission is complete. If the submission is determined to be incomplete, the Planner shall notify the applicant in writing of this finding, shall specify the additional material required to make the submission complete, and shall advise the applicant that the application will not be considered by the Board until the additional information is submitted. These steps, except the notification requirements, shall be repeated until the application is found to be complete. When the submission is determined to be complete, the Planner shall notify the applicant in writing of this finding and place the item on the agenda for review by the Board. The material shall also be provided to the members of the Staff Review Committee. The [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board shall hold an on-site inspection of the site to review the existing conditions, field verify the information submitted and investigate the development proposal. The Board may schedule this visit either before or after the first meeting at which the application is considered. The Board may decide not to hold an on-site inspection when the site is snow covered. If an application is pending during a period when there is snow cover, the deadline by which the Planning Board shall take final action on the application as specified in 2.8 may be extended, which extension shall not exceed [thirty (30)] days after the Board is able to conduct an on-site inspection. Written notice of the on-site inspection shall be provided to all parties entitled to notice under subsection 2.6. Within forty-five (45) days of the Board finding that the site inventory and analysis submission is complete, the Board shall complete its review of the submission and notify the applicant in writing of its findings. 2.5 Review of Site Inventory and Analysis The review of the site inventory and analysis shall be informational and shall not result in any formal approval or disapproval of the project by the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board. The parties identified in subsection 2.6 shall be notified of the time, date, and place of the Board meeting at which the site inventory and analysis will be reviewed. The Board shall review the submission to determine if the information provides a clear understanding of the site and identifies opportunities and constraints that help determine how it should be used and developed. The Board shall also consider any input received from members of the Staff Review Committee. The outcome of the review process shall be the identification by the Board of the issues and constraints that must be addressed in the formal site plan review application. The Board shall also act on any requests for waivers. 2.6 Procedures Following a Submission of a Site Plan Review Application
2.7 Public Hearing on Major Development Applications
2.8 Final Action on the Application The [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board shall take final action on said application within [thirty (30)] days of the public hearing. The Board shall act to deny, to approve, or to approve the application with conditions. The Board may impose such conditions as are deemed advisable to assure compliance with the standards of approval and performance standards of this ordinance. In issuing its decision, the Board shall make written findings of fact that establish whether the proposed development does or does not meet the standards of approval, performance standards, and other requirements of this ordinance. The Board shall notify the applicant and abutters who requested to be notified of the action of the Board including the findings of fact and any conditions of approval. This requirement can be met through the distribution of minutes of the meeting containing the findings of fact and decision of the Board. All time limits provided for in this section may be extended by mutual agreement of the applicant and Board. 3. Final Approval and Filing
Upon completion of the requirements of this article and an approval vote by the majority of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board members, the application shall be deemed to have final approval and the site plan shall be signed by a majority of the members of the Board and must be filed by the applicant with the [Planner]. Any plan not so filed within thirty (30) days of the date upon which such plan is approved and signed by the Board as herein provided shall become null and void. [In addition, the signed plan must be recorded in the ______ Registry of Deeds within thirty (30) days of the vote to approve the plan.] The [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board, by vote, may extend the filing period for good cause. 4. Fees 4.1 Site Inventory and Analysis Fees 4.1 Site Inventory and Analysis Fees Prior to submitting a site inventory and analysis for a major development, the applicant must pay a processing fee. This fee must be paid to the municipality, and evidence of payment of the fee shall be included with the submission. 4.2 Application Fee An application for site plan review must be accompanied by an application fee. This fee is intended to cover the cost of administrative processing of the application, including notification, advertising, mailings, and similar costs. The fee shall not be refundable. This application fee must be paid to the municipality, and evidence of payment of the fee must be included with the application.
4.3 Technical Review Fee In addition to the application fee, the applicant for site plan review must also pay a technical review fee to defray the legal and technical costs of the application review. This fee must be paid to the municipality and must be deposited in the Development Review Trust Account, which shall be separate and distinct from all other municipal accounts. The application will be considered incomplete until this fee is paid. The Board may reduce the amount of the technical review fee or waive it if it determines that the scale or nature of the project will require little or no outside review. The technical review fees may be used by the Board to pay for reasonable costs incurred by the Board, at its discretion, which relate directly to the review of the application pursuant to the review criteria. Such services may include, but need not be limited to, consulting engineering or other professional fees, attorney fees, recording fees, and appraisal fees. The municipality shall provide the applicant, upon written request, with an accounting of his or her account and shall refund all of the remaining monies, including accrued interest, in the account after the payment by the municipality of all costs and services related to the review. Such payment of remaining monies shall be made no later than sixty (60) days after the approval of the application, denial of the application, or approval with condition of the application. Such refund shall be accompanied by a final accounting of expenditures from the fund. The monies in such fund shall not be used by the Board for any enforcement purposes nor shall the applicant be liable for costs incurred by or costs of services contracted for by the Board which exceed the amount deposited to the trust account. 4.4 Establishment of Fees The Municipal Officers may, from time to time and after consultation with the Board, establish the appropriate fees following posting of the proposed schedule of fees and public hearing." C. Submission Requirements If the administrative procedures create two categories of review, minor developments and major developments, the submission requirements in the basic ordinance must be replaced with submission requirements that establish different requirements for the two categories. Appropriate replacement language is provided in this section. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
1. Site Inventory and Analysis Submission Requirements The site inventory and analysis is intended to provide both the applicant and the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board with a better understanding of the site and the opportunities and constraints imposed on its use by both the natural and built environment. It is anticipated that this analysis will result in a development plan that reflects the conditions of the site; those areas most suitable for the proposed use will be utilized, while those that are not suitable or present significant constraints will be avoided to the maximum extent possible. Therefore, the submission requirements provide that the applicant submit basic information about the site and an analysis of that information. The site inventory and analysis submission must contain, at a minimum, the following information:
2. Site Plan Review Application Submission Requirements Applications for site plan review must be submitted on application forms provided by the [Town] [City]. The complete application form, evidence of payment of the required fees, and the required plans and related information must be submitted to the [Planner] [Code Enforcement Officer] [Chair of the Board]. Applications for major developments will not be received until the review of the site inventory and analysis is completed. The submission must contain at least the following exhibits and information, unless specifically waived in writing:
2.1 All Applications All applications for site plan review must contain the following information:
2.1.a General Information
2.1.b Existing Conditions
2.1.c Proposed Development Activity
2.1.d Approval Block Space must be provided on the plan drawing for the signatures of the [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board and date, together with the following words, "Approved: [Town] [City] of [name of City or Town] [Planning] [Site Plan Review] Board.
2.2 Major Developments In addition to the information required for all applicants, an application for a major development must contain the following additional information.
3. Waiver of the Submission Requirements The [Planner] [Planning Board] [Site Plan Review Board] may waive any of the submission requirements based upon a written request of the applicant. Such request must be made at the time of the preapplication conference or at the initial review of the application if no preapplication conference is held. A waiver of any submission requirement may be granted only if the [Planner] [Board] finds that the information is not required to determine compliance with the standards and criteria. SECTION 11. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OF APPROVALGOOD NEIGHBOR STANDARDS1. Exterior LightingExterior Lighting - The proposed development must have adequate exterior lighting to provide for its safe use during nighttime hours, if such use is contemplated. All exterior lighting must be designed and shielded to avoid undue glare, adverse impact on neighboring properties and rights-of-way, and the unnecessary lighting of the night sky. or Exterior Lighting - The proposed development must have adequate exterior lighting to provide for its safe use during nighttime hours, if such use is contemplated.
Lighting may be used which serves security, safety and operational needs but which does not directly or indirectly produce deleterious effects on abutting properties or which would impair the vision of a vehicle operator on adjacent roadways. Lighting fixtures must be shielded or hooded so that the lighting elements are not exposed to normal view by motorists, pedestrians, or from adjacent dwellings and so that they do not unnecessarily light the night sky. Direct or indirect illumination must not exceed 0.5 footcandles at the lot line or upon abutting residential properties. All exterior lighting, except security lighting, must be turned off between 11 P.M. and 6 A.M. unless located on the site of a commercial or industrial use which is open for business during that period. Wiring to light poles and standards must be underground. 2. Buffering of Adjacent UsesBuffering - The development must provide for the buffering of adjacent uses where there is a transition from one type of use to another use and for the screening of mechanical equipment and service and storage areas. The buffer may be provided by distance, landscaping, fencing, changes in grade, and/or a combination of these or other techniques. or Buffering - The development must provide for the buffering of adjacent uses where there is a transition from one type of use to another use and for screening of mechanical equipment and service and storage areas. Buffering must be designed to provide a year-round visual screen in order to minimize adverse impacts. It may consist of fencing, evergreens, berms, rocks, boulders, mounds, or a combination thereof. A development must provide sufficient buffering when topographical or other barriers do not provide reasonable screening and where there is a need to:
The width of the buffer may vary depending on the treatment of the area. Within densely built-up areas, a buffer with dense plantings, fencing, or changes in grade may be as little as five (5) feet in width. A buffer with moderate levels of planting should be ten (10) feet to fifteen (15) feet in width. In suburban and rural settings, the width of the vegetated buffer should be increased to a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet. Areas adjacent to service, loading, or storage areas should be screened by dense planting, berms, fencing, or a combination thereof with a width of a minimum of five (5) feet. 3. NoiseNoise - The development must control noise levels such that it will not create a nuisance for neighboring properties. or Noise - The maximum permissible sound pressure level of any continuous, regular or frequent or intermittent source of sound produced by any activity on the site shall be limited by the time period and by the abutting land use as listed below. Sound levels shall be measured at least four (4) feet above ground at the property boundary of the source. Noise shall be measured by a meter set on the A-weighted response scale, fast response. The meter shall meet the American National Standards Institute (ANSI S1 4- 1961) American Standards Specification for General Purpose Sound Level Meters. No person shall engage in construction activities, on a site abutting any residential use between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. 4. Storage of MaterialsStorage of Materials - Exposed nonresidential storage areas, exposed machinery, and areas used for the storage or collection of discarded automobiles, auto parts, metals or other articles of salvage or refuse must have sufficient setbacks and screening (such as a stockade fence or a dense evergreen hedge) to provide a visual buffer sufficient to minimize their impact on abutting residential uses and users of public streets. All dumpsters or similar large collection receptacles for trash or other wastes must be located on level surfaces which are paved or graveled. Where the dumpster or receptacle is located in a yard which abuts a residential or institutional use or a public street, it must be screened by fencing or landscaping. Where a potential safety hazard to children is likely to arise, physical screening sufficient to deter small children from entering the premises must be provided and maintained in good condition. DESIGN STANDARDS1. LandscapingLandscaping -Landscaping must be provided as part of site design. The landscape plan for the entire site must use landscape materials to integrate the various elements on site, preserve and enhance the particular identity of the site, and create a pleasing site character. The landscaping should define street edges, break up parking areas, soften the appearance of the development, and protect abutting properties. Landscaping may include plant materials such as trees, shrubs, groundcovers, perennials, and annuals, and other materials such as rocks, water, sculpture, art, walls, fences, paving materials, and street furniture. 2. Building PlacementBuilding Placement - The site design should avoid creating a building surrounded by a parking lot. In urban, built-up areas and in villages, buildings should be placed close to the street, in conformance with existing, adjacent setbacks. Parking should be to the side or preferably in the back. In rural, uncongested areas buildings should be set well back from the road so as to conform with the rural character of the area. If the parking is in front, a generous, landscaped buffer between road and parking lot is to be provided. Unused areas should be kept natural, as field, forest, wetland, etc. Where two or more buildings are proposed, the buildings should be grouped and linked with sidewalks; tree planting should be used to provide shade and break up the scale of the site. Parking areas should be separated from the building by a minimum of five (5) to ten (10) feet. Plantings should be provided along the building edge, particularly where building facades consist of long or unbroken walls. 3. Building IlluminationBuilding Illumination - Building facades may be illuminated with soft lighting of low intensity that does not draw inordinate attention to the building. The light source for the building facade illumination must be concealed. Building entrances may be illuminated using recessed lighting in overhangs and soffits, or by use of spotlighting focused on the building entrances with the light source concealed (e.g., in landscaped areas). Direct lighting of limited exterior building areas is permitted when necessary for security purposes. 4. Building EntrancesBuilding Entrances - The main entrance to the building should be oriented to the street unless the parking layout or the grouping of the buildings justifies another approach, and should be clearly identified as such through building and site design, landscaping, and/or signage. At building entrance areas and drop-off areas, site furnishings such as benches and sitting walls and, if appropriate, bicycle racks shall be encouraged. Additional plantings may be desirable at these points to identify the building entrance and to complement the pedestrian activity at this point. 5. Setback and Alignment of BuildingsSetback and Alignment of Buildings - Where there is a reasonably uniform relationship between the front walls of buildings and the street, new buildings must be placed on a lot in conformance with the established relationship. For buildings on corner lots, the setback relationship of both streets should be maintained. The creation of empty corners should be avoided through the placement of the building and other site features. 6. Business SignsBusiness Signs - Freestanding commercial business signs should be placed at right angles to the street so as to be viewed from both directions. Simple, geometrically shaped signs set low the ground must be used. Minimize the number of words and use symbols to catch the eye. Signs shall be no larger than 4' x 4' or 4' x 8'. In urban, built-up areas commercial business signs must be placed on the building, unless visibility is impaired and a freestanding sign is the best option. 7. SidewalksSidewalks - Where an existing or planned public sidewalk is interrupted by a proposed project driveway, the sidewalk material must continue to be maintained across the driveway, or the driveway must be painted to distinguish it as a sidewalk. Further, if street trees exist on an adjacent property, street trees must be planted, in a like manner, on the new site. In urban situations a widening of the sidewalk onto private property to encourage window shopping and an improved streetscape should be encouraged. Benches, sculpture, planters and other street furniture should be encouraged. 8. Location of Off-Street ParkingLocation of Off-Street Parking - Within built-up areas, parking lots should be located to the side or rear of the building. Parking should not be located between the building and the street. The use of shared parking, shared driveways and the cross- connection of parking lots is encouraged. In suburban and rural areas, smaller uses that may need public visibility from the street should be sited as close to the street as possible. In this case, not more than one (1) row of parking shall be allowed between the building and the street, with the balance of the parking located at the side and/or rear of the building. Larger scale uses and uses which do not require visibility from the road may be located further from the road with a landscaped buffer between the building and the street. 9. Landscaped Roadside BuffersLandscaped Roadside Buffers - Whenever the area between the street and the front of the building is used for parking or vehicle movement, a vegetated buffer strip must be established along the edge of the road right-of-way. This buffer strip must soften the appearance of the site from the road and must create defined points of access to and egress from the site. The width of the buffer strip must increase with the setback of the building as follows:
Where the buffer cannot be achieved, a low wall, fence, or hedge may be used to create the buffer. 10. Landscaping of Parking LotsLandscaping of Parking Lots - Landscaping around and within parking lots shades hot surfaces and visually "softens" the hard surface look of parking areas. Parking areas must be designed and landscaped to create a pedestrian-friendly environment. A landscaped border must be created around parking lots. Any parking lot containing ten (10) or more parking spaces must include one (1) or more landscaped islands within the interior of the lot. There must be at least one (1) island for every twenty (20) spaces. Landscaping must screen the parking area from adjacent residential uses and from the street. 11. Building OrientationBuilding Orientation - New buildings within a built-up area should be compatible with the neighborhood such that they reflect the overall building bulk, square footage, dimensions, placement of the building on the lot, and rhythm of buildings and spaces along the street edge and minimize the visual impact on the neighborhood. The visual impact of a building shall be measured by its relationship to other buildings on the lot, design of the front of the building, and the rhythm of buildings and open spaces along the street. 12. Building ScaleBuilding Scale - When large new buildings or structures are proposed in built-up areas where their scale (size) and other features may be significantly different from that which already exists in the immediate neighborhood, care must be taken to design the new building or structure so that it is compatible with its neighbors. This may include making the building appear small, using traditional materials, styles and/or proportions. 13. Design of Drive-Through FacilitiesDrive-Through Facilities - Any use that provides drive-through service must be located and designed to minimize the impact on neighboring properties and traffic circulation. No drive-through facility shall be located in the area of the site adjacent to a residential use or residential zone. Communication systems must not be audible on adjacent properties in residential use. Vehicular access to the drive-through shall be through a separate lane that prevents vehicle queuing within normal parking areas. Adequate queuing space must be provided to prevent any vehicles from having to wait on a public street, within the entry from the street, or within designated parking areas. The drive-through must not interfere with any sidewalk or bicycle path. 14. View ProtectionView Protection - When a proposed development is located within the viewshed of an identified view from a public street or facility, the development must be designed to minimize the encroachment of all buildings, structures, landscaping, and other site features on the identified view. 15. Ridgeline ProtectionRidgeline Protection - When a proposed development is located on a hillside that is visible from a public street, road, water body, or facility, the development must be designed so that buildings, structures, and other improvements do not extend above the existing ridgeline or alter the ridge profile significantly when viewed from the public streets, roads, water bodies, or facilities. This provision may be waived for communication towers, spotting towers, and similar facilities that must be located above the ridgeline for operational reasons. 16. Hillside DevelopmentHillside Development - When a proposed development is located on a hillside that is visible from a public street, road, water body, or facility, the development must be designed so that it fits harmoniously into the visual environment when viewed by the public from public areas. In predominantly natural environments, site clearing must be minimized and vegetation must be retained or provided to minimize the visual intrusion of the development. In developed environments, the appearance of the new development, when viewed by the public from public areas, must be compatible with the existing visual character in terms of scale, massing, and height to the maximum extent reasonable. 17. Shoreland DevelopmentShoreland Development - When a proposed development is immediately visible from a great pond, river, stream, or the Atlantic Ocean, the development must be designed so that it fits harmoniously into the visual environment when viewed from the water body. In predominantly natural environments, site clearing must be minimized, natural vegetation must be maintained adjacent to the shoreline to soften the appearance of the development, and vegetation must be retained or provided to minimize the visual intrusion of the development. In developed shoreland environments, the appearance of the new development when viewed from the water must be compatible with the existing visual character in terms of scale, massing, and height to the maximum extent possible. Storage and service areas must be screened or landscaped to minimize their visual impact. |
|
| Copyright © 2006 All rights reserved. |